Canon G7X Mark II Vs III: Key Differences & Best Pick

Both are strong pocket cameras; Mark III wins for video, Mark II for value.

When I compare the canon g7x mark ii vs iii in real life, I’m thinking about travel, street shots, and quick vlogs. I’ve used both on city walks and hotel-room setups. The core dilemma is simple: the Mark II is cheaper and reliable, while the Mark III adds 4K, a mic jack, and faster burst. I tested both side by side and I’ll share what actually matters so you can choose with confidence.

Is Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Good?

Yes, for most people who want a pocket camera at a fair price, the Mark II is a smart buy. It shoots lovely photos, delivers Canon’s classic color, and it is fast enough for daily use. If you don’t need 4K video or a mic input, it covers the basics very well. For the canon g7x mark ii vs iii debate, the Mark II wins on value.

On a rainy weekend trip, I kept the Mark II in my jacket pocket and shot cozy cafe scenes at f/1.8 without worrying about size or weight. Another time, I filmed a quick 1080p recipe clip on my kitchen counter; the tilting screen and stabilization saved me from a full setup. It’s simple, dependable, and friendly.

What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features

• 20.1MP 1-inch sensor with DIGIC 7 processing
• 24–100mm equivalent f/1.8–2.8 lens with Optical IS and built-in ND
• Full HD 1080p up to 60 fps video
• Tilt-up 3.0-inch touchscreen for selfies and vlogging
• Compact body with Wi‑Fi for quick sharing

What I Like

• Great low-light shots thanks to the bright f/1.8–2.8 lens
• Classic Canon colors right out of camera
• Rock-solid stabilization for handheld photos and 1080p video
• Simple menu and responsive touch controls
• Excellent value on a budget compared to the Mark III
• Pocketable size makes it an easy daily carry
• JPEGs look nice with minimal tweaking

What Could Be Better

• No 4K video and no mic input
• Contrast-detect AF can hunt during video
• Micro-USB charging only, no Bluetooth

My Recommendation

If you want great photos, solid 1080p, and the best price-to-performance, pick the Mark II. It’s the practical choice for beginners and travelers.

Best For	Why
Budget creators	Delivers strong images and video without the higher cost
Travel and street	Pocket size, bright lens, and simple controls
Beginner vloggers	Easy to use with a flip screen and stable 1080p

Is Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III Good?

Yes, if video is your focus, the Mark III is the better pick. It adds 4K/30p, 1080/120p slow motion, a mic jack, and USB‑C charging. For the canon g7x mark ii vs iii comparison, this is the creator-friendly model. It also shoots up to 20 fps bursts for action.

I used the Mark III to record a street musician with a small shotgun mic, and the audio jump was huge. During a quick coffee shop livestream, the USB‑C power kept it running without fuss. AF is still contrast-based, so it can wobble in tough light, but the feature set helps you create more with less gear.

What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features

• 4K/30p video and 1080/120p slow motion
• 3.5mm mic input and clean, creator-focused feature set
• 20.1MP 1-inch sensor with DIGIC 8 and up to 20 fps bursts
• USB‑C charging, Bluetooth, and Wi‑Fi
• 24–100mm f/1.8–2.8 lens with Optical IS and vertical video support

What I Like

• 4K video looks sharp and detailed for a compact
• Mic jack improves audio quality without external recorders
• USB‑C power is perfect for desk setups and travel banks
• Fast burst and RAW burst modes for action moments
• Live streaming and clean HDMI expand creator options
• Bluetooth makes remote control and pairing easier

What Could Be Better

• AF can still hunt in video, especially in low light
• 4K sessions may run hot; clip length can be limited
• Costs more than the Mark II

My Recommendation

Choose the Mark III if you care about 4K, audio, and creator tools. It’s the versatile choice for modern content.

Best For	Why
Vloggers and streamers	4K, mic input, and USB‑C power simplify production
Hybrid shooters	Strong video plus fast stills bursts
On-the-go creators	Compact size with pro-friendly features

canon g7x mark ii vs iii: Side-by-Side Test

I tested both cameras across streets, rooms, and a simple desk rig. Here is how the canon g7x mark ii vs iii stack up in the areas that matter most.

Image Quality & Low Light: Which Looks Better?

Both use a 20.1MP 1″ sensor and the same bright lens. Colors and dynamic range are very close.

Spec	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
Sensor & Resolution	1″ 20.1MP	1″ 20.1MP
Processor	DIGIC 7	DIGIC 8
Lens	24–100mm f/1.8–2.8	24–100mm f/1.8–2.8
Low-Light Results	Clean up to ISO ~1600	Slightly cleaner JPEG noise handling

Rating: Mark II – 8/10 | Mark III – 8.5/10

Mark III has a small edge with DIGIC 8 noise handling, but both look great.

Video & Streaming Tools: Who Wins for Creators?

This is the biggest difference in the canon g7x mark ii vs iii matchup.

Spec	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
Max Video	1080/60p	4K/30p, 1080/120p
Mic Input	No	Yes, 3.5mm
Streaming	No native tools	Designed for livestream features
Ports	Micro-USB	USB‑C, clean HDMI

Rating: Mark II – 6.5/10 | Mark III – 9/10

Mark III clearly wins for video and live content with 4K, mic input, and USB‑C.

Autofocus & Performance: Speed in the Real World

Both rely on contrast-detect AF; no Dual Pixel AF here.

Spec	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
AF Type	Contrast AF	Contrast AF (tuned)
Continuous Shooting	Up to ~8 fps	Up to 20 fps; RAW burst modes
Face Tracking	Good in bright light	Better tracking, still can wobble
AF in Video	Occasional hunting	Improved but can hunt in low light

Rating: Mark II – 7/10 | Mark III – 8/10

Mark III is faster for bursts and tracking; both are modest for video AF.

Lens & Stabilization: Handheld Confidence

The lens is the same on both, which is great news.

Spec	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
Lens Range	24–100mm eq.	24–100mm eq.
Max Aperture	f/1.8–2.8	f/1.8–2.8
Stabilization	Optical + digital (video)	Optical + digital (video)
Built-in ND	Yes	Yes

Rating: Mark II – 8.5/10 | Mark III – 8.5/10

It’s a draw. The shared lens is the secret sauce for both cameras.

Connectivity & Audio: Modern Conveniences

Here’s where the canon g7x mark ii vs iii split is obvious.

Feature	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
Wireless	Wi‑Fi	Wi‑Fi + Bluetooth
Audio	Internal mics only	3.5mm mic input
Charging	Micro‑USB	USB‑C (power delivery friendly)
HDMI	Basic output	Clean HDMI for capture

Rating: Mark II – 6.5/10 | Mark III – 9/10

Mark III adds the creator must-haves: mic jack, Bluetooth, USB‑C, and clean HDMI.

Battery Life & Power: How Long Do They Run?

Both use the same NB‑13L battery, with similar endurance.

Spec	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
CIPA Rating	Solid for a compact	Slightly lower on paper
USB Power	Micro‑USB (slower)	USB‑C; great for power banks
Heat in Video	Stable at 1080p	4K can warm up on long takes
Real-World Use	One battery covers a light day	USB‑C helps extend runtime

Rating: Mark II – 7.5/10 | Mark III – 7.5/10

It’s a tie. Mark II sips power; Mark III’s USB‑C offsets its heavier features.

Handling & Controls: Everyday Ergonomics

Both bodies feel alike, with a nice grip and clear menus.

Aspect	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
Body Size/Weight	Compact, ~319g	Compact, slightly lighter
Screen	3.0″ flip-up touch	3.0″ flip-up touch
Control Ring	Clickable/de-clickable	Clickable/de-clickable
Learning Curve	Very short	Very short

Rating: Mark II – 8.5/10 | Mark III – 8.5/10

Another draw. Both are easy to carry and quick to master.

Value for Money: Where’s the Smart Spend?

This is the heart of the canon g7x mark ii vs iii choice for most buyers.

Factor	G7 X Mark II	G7 X Mark III
Price	Lower	Higher
Features	Great basics	4K, mic, USB‑C, Bluetooth
Who Benefits	Travelers, beginners	Creators, hybrid shooters
Longevity	Still relevant for 1080p	More future-proof for video

Rating: Mark II – 9/10 | Mark III – 8/10

Mark II wins pure value; Mark III wins if you’ll use the extra video tools.

Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?

If you mainly shoot photos and simple 1080p clips, get the Mark II. It’s cheaper, reliable, and lovely to use. For the canon g7x mark ii vs iii value debate, the Mark II is the budget champ.

If you need 4K, a mic input, USB‑C power, and faster bursts, choose the Mark III. It’s the better fit for vloggers, streamers, and hybrid creators. In canon g7x mark ii vs iii terms: Mark II for savings, Mark III for features.

FAQs Of canon g7x mark ii vs iii

What’s the biggest difference in the canon g7x mark ii vs iii?

The Mark III adds 4K/30p, a 3.5mm mic input, USB‑C charging, Bluetooth, and faster bursts. The Mark II tops out at 1080/60p and lacks a mic jack.

Is the Mark III autofocus better than the Mark II?

Slightly. Both use contrast AF. The Mark III tracks faces better and shoots faster bursts, but video AF can still wobble in low light.

For vlogging in the canon g7x mark ii vs iii, which is best?

The Mark III. 4K, a mic input, and USB‑C power make it a stronger vlogging tool. The Mark II is fine for simple 1080p.

Do both cameras have the same lens?

Yes. Both use the 24–100mm f/1.8–2.8 lens with Optical IS and a built-in ND filter. That lens is a big reason both are popular.

Which offers better value in the canon g7x mark ii vs iii?

The Mark II offers the best price-to-performance for most users. The Mark III is worth it if you need its video and audio features.